Cal Court of Appeal Decision Questions Use of Private Domains for Email

In Balsam v Trancos (Cal. Ct. App. Nos. A128485, A129458 – February 24, 2012), the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s $7,000 judgment in favor of notorious spamigator Dan Balsam under California’s anti-spam law (Business & Professions Code Section 17529 et seq.) It is the only case under the statute to actually go to trial…

IN THE COURTS: Cal Spam Law, New Mass Internet Law & Flash Cookies

9th Cir. – Cal Spam Statute Has Heightened Pleading Requirement and 1 Yr SOL In a four page decision, the 9th Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the complaint in Hypertouch v. Azoogle et al. finding that allegations of fraudulent conduct under California’s spam law must be plead with particularity and that it was subject…

9th Cir. – Cal Spam Statute Has Heightened Pleading Requirement and 1 Yr SOL

In a four page decision, the 9th Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the Hypertouch complaint finding that allegations of fraudulent conduct under California’s spam law must be plead with particularity and that it was subject to a one-year statute of limitations. hypertouch ruling